Look who's calling who racist!

Commenting on what would happen in the cataclysmic event that The Anointed One should lose, James Carville informed us that it would be 'traumatic out there' with rioting and all kinds of unrest. His assumption, of course, is that Blacks are so politically and socially immature that their only response to defeat is violence. Have you ever heard anyone utter that Whites will destroy property and loot stores if a White candidate loses? Of course not, and this is because the assumption is that Whites are somehow civilized and in control of themselves.

To declare that Blacks' likely response to political disappointment is chaos is to imply that Blacks have the maturity and intelligence of unruly children, which fits my definition of racism any day of the week. It also fits my definition of hypocrisy, since liberals like Carville are always painting Democrats as enlightened, noble crusaders of social justice, equality and intelligence and Republicans as either arrogant, elitist, out-of-touch rich people or ignorant, praying hicks living in the sticks all united by racial intolerance.

I submit that James Carville's comment about Blacks rioting if Obama loses is as racist as it gets but, of course, since such an asinine statement comes from the mouth and mind of a liberal, it is a deep political observation and warning. At least, it assumes that all Blacks react like crazy fiends when things do not go their way. At worst, it incites, rationalizes and justifies such behavior, giving a free pass to any wishing to fulfill that prediction. Justifying and rationalizing violence because of prior injustice or oppression is nothing new to liberals, who actually began lecturing us on why we had it coming on 9-11."