Monday, March 30, 2009

What Have You Obama Voters Done to Us?



This is probably the gravest posting yet. We tried to tell you this would happen but you would not believe us:

"In the last 48 hours, we've witnessed a presidential pretender fire the chief executive officer of General Motors and put a gun to the head of the Chrysler Corp., demanding that this U.S. business begin the process of selling out to a foreign automaker.

"What do you call it when Obama makes moves to take over the auto industry? A coupe d'etat.

"But it is hardly a joking matter.

"Do you realize what just happened?

"How does a president fire a CEO?

"If Obama can fire the head of a troubled, but legendary corporation like GM and then order its business plan to be rewritten according to his wishes, presidential power has become unlimited. We no longer live in the United States of America that is guided by a Constitution based on the limited power of government. We live in a tyranny, and we're all subject to the whims of one man.

"I have news for you, though: If Obama calls for my resignation as CEO of WND, he needs to know he can have my business when he pries it from my cold, dead fingers.

"What's going on in this country? Has everyone gone mad? Are we all suffering from a new form of collective Alzheimer's disease? Have we forgotten our roots, our heritage of freedom, our constitutional foundations?

"Obama said he has 'no intention' of running General Motors. But he fired the CEO and demanded a 'better business plan.' Has he ever written a business plan? Has he ever seen one?

"Of course, this is the trouble with bailouts. Would it not have been better to permit GM to die a dignified death than to be placed in the hands of community organizers?

"Obama went on to say he doesn't want GM and Chrysler to become 'wards of the state.' When someone or something becomes a 'ward of the state,' by definition, the state gets custody. That's exactly where these automakers are now. They are in the custody of the state. Where exactly can they go from here? Does anyone really believe the government will ever let go and allow these businesses to operate as businesses?

"There's a name for this kind of government direction of what have traditionally been private corporations. It's called 'fascism.' (That is Fascism with a capital FAC and a capital CISM -- Robert) Look it up. This is what Mussolini did. It's what Hitler did with what had been a 'private sector' in Germany. Just think Volkswagen

. Hitler personally designed what we call 'the bug.' Volkswagen literally means 'people's car.'

"But what does the community organizer in chief know about the car business? What does he know about any kind of business, for that matter? The arrogance of these actions is mind-boggling.

"He's even sending mixed signals – suggesting he does not even know or care about the ultimate outcome. For instance, he said the companies involved and the government might have to consider 'using our bankruptcy code' to help in the restructuring he demands. At the same time, he says he will not require the companies to immediately repay government loan money that would force them into Chapter 11.

"It's like directed chaos – which is why I say it is becoming more obvious all the time that the goal is to destroy rather than save or build a viable economy.

"He's not a commander in chief. He's a destroyer in chief.

"I really believe he wants to bring on a depression.

"Remember what his chief of staff said: 'You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.'

"It seems like Obama is determined to make the most of the nation's serious crisis – perhaps by making it even more serious, thereby expanding the opportunity."

Sunday, March 29, 2009

Disarmed German Jews and the Holocaust

Dick Armey: 'For the First Time I Have a President That Scares Me'

Peter Schiff The Dollar is Gonna Drop Like a Stone

Peter Schiff Keynesianism is Witchcraft

An Obama Election Sing-Along

WHY DO THEY WANT OUR GUNS?

Federal Criminal Complaint Contends Obama Ineligible for Presidency

Reid Tells Far Left Wing Democrats To Back Off Moderates

"For quite a while we have brought news of the far left wing of the Democratic party targeting moderate Democrats, usually referred to as Blue Dog Democrats. We have shown example after example of liberal bloggers starting whole campaigns to get these Blue Dog Democrats out of office.

"Most Blue Dogs represent conservative districts, some that used to be offices held by Republicans, and the reason they were voted in was because they were moderates that represent the constituency, rather than just a liberal agenda.

"Despite that, groups like MoveOn.org and blogs like Open Left, with a variety of others have made it a goal to hinder the moderates chances of reelection."

Seems the Democratic Party has an enemy within itself. Sounds like cancer....

Saturday, March 28, 2009

The Outrage Over Oakland Cop Killer In Larger Context

"Of course, the Chronicle and most of the rest of the media most definitely don’t want to tell you the full story: for example, it’s NOT the 'Uhuru Movement' who marched in the street praising a cop murdering rapist career dirtbag; it’s the International People’s Democratic Uhuru Movement. Wouldn’t want anyone to in any way be able to connect this 'movement' (as in ‘bowel movement’) to Democrats, would we?

"We also learn that Mixon’s cousin, Dolores Darnell, 26, called Mixon 'a true hero, a soldier.' (We love our criminal element, right? -- Robert) And DEMOCRATIC Uhuru Movement member Kihad Deen argued, 'I don’t condone what he did, but it’s bringing to light the frustrations between the community and the police. This gives people a chance to speak their minds.'

"If one person - just one - in that march voted for or in any way supported John McCain, I will eat my underwear. This is a hard-core liberal movement supporting hard-core leftist causes - and the left deserves full 'credit' for the DEMOCRATIC Uhuru Movement’s 'contributions.'”

The Increasingly Shocking Parallels Between Obama And Hitler Youth


"If this footage doesn’t disturb you to your very core, I don’t even know what to say. We have here a militarized group of young men being steeped in not only political ideology, but in literal cult worship of Barack Obama.

"This was going on before the election. I still remember the video featuring a glassy-eyed girl singing, 'We’re gonna spread happiness! We’re gonna spread freeeeedom! Obama’s gonna change it, Obama’s gonna lead ‘em…' The cult mindset continued into his inauguration, with a creepy 'Kids’ Inaugural.' That article also contains embedded video of a public school teacher - in a frightening version of any political re-education center in Moscow or Beijing - using public pressure, guilt, and every other tactic she could think of to browbeat a little child into supporting Obama. It wasn’t enough that most of the children supported Obama; every child had to, with particular emphasis on the 'had to' part.

"I remember Louis Farrakhan saying:

'You are the instruments that God is gonna use to bring about universal change, and that is why Barack has captured the youth. And he has involved young people in a political process that they didn’t care anything about. That’s a sign. When the Messiah speaks, the youth will hear, and the Messiah is absolutely speaking.'

"And I remember Spike Lee saying:

'It means that this is a whole new world. I think…I’ve been saying this before. You can divide history. BB Before Barack. AB After Barack.'

"And I remember countless other gushing affirmations of Obama as messiah in the media.

"The only thing that was missing from all this was that it was not mandatory. But that is being fixed as we speak.

"And now it is picking up momentum and heading into a new stratosphere of weirdness.

"The Generations Invigorating Volunteerism and Education Act (GIVE) will massively increase the Americorps program to the tune of $6 billion. The money quote:

'But the bill’s opponents — and there are only a few in Congress — say it could cram ideology down the throats of young “volunteers,” many of whom could be forced into service since the bill creates a 'Congressional Commission on Civic Service.'

"Quite a shame that only a few opposed this in Congress, given the fact that the model this new 'Obama Youth' program is based upon - Americorps - qualifies as 'number one' in Heritage.org’s list of political slush funds. Heritage describes the Americorps program - then receiving a 'paltry' $427 million - as follows:

"In 1993-1994, AmeriCorps employed about 20,000 'volunteers' described as'“working all over America, helping people ­­ person to person.'2 In reality, a significant number of these paid volunteers work in federal or state bureaucracies, government-funded programs, or political action organizations3. Moreover, ignoring the Corporation’s mission statement to address the nation’s problems through direct community service, several AmeriCorps programs have engaged in advocacy and direct partisan politics at the expense of the taxpayers.'

"The Heritage article goes on to document several abuses. Author Charles Griffin concludes by submitting that, 'Subsidizing political activism does not qualify as responsible behavior.'

"Which is another way of saying that the writer of the Heritage article was not a Democrat. Because Democrats adore taxpayer-funded vehicles to advance their liberal ideology.

"Get ready for ACORN on steroids.

"The Gateway Pundit offered this:

"The House passed the Generations Invigorating Volunteerism and Education Act on Monday. The bill includes language indicating young people will be forced to participate in mandatory national service programs. The bill also states that 'service learning' will be a mandatory part of the youth curriculum.
That doesn’t sound much like 'volunteerism' does it?

"…The mandatory youth plan also forbids members from attending religious services and forbids youth from witnessing their religious beliefs. The Voice Magazine reported, via Free Republic:

'This bill’s title is called “Generations Invigorating Volunteerism and Education” (GIVE). It forms what some are calling “Obama’s Youth Brigade.” Obama’s plan is require anyone receiving school loans and others to serve at least three months as part of the brigade. His goal is one million youth! This has serious Nazi Germany overtones to it.

'The Bill would forbid any student in the brigade to participate in “engaging in religious instruction, conducting worship services, providing instruction as part of a program that includes mandatory religious instruction or worship, constructing or operating facilities devoted to religious instruction or worship, maintaining facilities primarily or inherently devoted to religious instruction or worship, or engaging in any form of religious proselytization.” That means no church attendance or witnessing.'"

"One of Adolf Hitler’s contributions to the relationship between parents, children, and the state was this: 'When an opponent declares, “I will not come over to your side,” I calmly say, “Your child belongs to us already… What are you? You will pass on. Your descendants, however, now stand in the new camp. In a short time they will know nothing else but this new community.”'

"Which is precisely Obama’s and liberals’ goal as well.

"And the element of mandating religion out of the lives of young people is a cherished goal of atheists, as the following conclusively demonstrates:

'How can we ever know how many children had their psychological and physical lives irreparably maimed by the compulsory inculcation of faith? Religion … has always hoped to practice upon the unformed and undefended minds of the young… If religious instruction were not allowed until the child had attained the age of reason, we would be living in a quite different world.' - Christopher Hitchens

'If scientists can destroy the influence of religion on young people, then I think it may be the most important contribution we can make.' - Steven Weinberg

'How much do we regard children as being the property of their parents? it’s one thing to say people should be free to believe whatever they like, but should they be free to impose their beliefs on their children? Is there something to be said for society stepping in? What about bringing up children to beleive manifest falsehoods? Isn’t it always a form of child abuse to label children as possessors of beliefs that they are too young to have thought out?' - Richard Dawkins

'[S]ome children are raised in such an ideological prison that they willingly become their own jailers… Parents don’t literally own their children the way slaveowners once owned slaves, but are, rather, their stewards and guardians and ought to be held accountable by outsiders for their guardianship, which does imply that outsiders have a right to interfere.' - Daniel Dennett

'Parents, correspondingly, have no god-given license to enculcate their children in whatever ways they personally choose: no right to limit the horizons of their children’s knowledge, to bring them up in an atmosphere of dogma and superstitition, or to insist they follow the straight and narrow paths of their own faith.' - Nicholas Humphrey

'And philosopher Richard Rorty argued that secular professors in the universities ought “to arrange things so that students who enter as bigoted, homophobic religious fundamentalists will leave college with views more like their own.” He noted that students are fortunate to find themselves “under the benevolent Herrschaft of people like me, and to have escaped the grip of their frightening, vicious, dangerous parents.” He said to parents who send their children to college, “we are going to go right on trying to discredit you in the eyes of your children, trying to strip your fundamentalist religious community of dignity, trying to make your views seem silly rather than reasonable.”'

"And I say this: 'Spoken just as the true fascist, totalitarian Nazis these people at heart are.' Parents don’t have a right to teach their children their religious and moral values. No, the state alone should have that right, and the values of the state should be Darwinian values. And in the interest and under the power of the state, parents should have their values undermined, mocked, and discarded by the imposition of the new American religion under the new socialist system. Nazism and Marxism are both quintessentially socialist, so pick your favorite brand of poison and drink deeply.

"Don’t think that this new Brownshirt program would have been embraced any less favorably by Adolf Hitler than it would have been by Joseph Stalin. A great read on the subject is 'The Nazis and Christianity' by Bruce Walker in the American Thinker.

"As G.K. Chesterton put it so magnificently, 'When people stop believing in God, they don’t believe in nothing - they believe in anything.'

"Kiss your dear children goodbye, parents. Because very soon they are going to hate you and everything you stand for. Very soon they are going to be jackbooted little Obama robots marching around and shouting in cadence, 'Because of Obama I’m inspired to be the next X, Y, and Z!' and of course, the new American version of 'Seig Heil': 'Yes, we can!'

Our president's purposeful plan to ruin us

"Also over the weekend, Iran's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei shot down Obama's overtures toward forging 'constructive ties' with the rogue Islamic theocracy. Now, we've certainly seen enough fruits of the soft, squishy diplomacy we tend to get from Democratic presidents to have known what to expect. Given Obama's early upbringing and affinity for America-hating individuals and entities, it ought to be no surprise that he is proceeding with such apparent carelessness.

"Brigitte Gabriel, the Lebanese-born former news anchor and expert on the Islamic world and global terrorism, analyzed Obama's appeal to Iran, applying insights that spoke volumes. The appearance of the Farsi-subtitled video he sent to the ayatollah was bereft of any display of his office. The language he used and the manner in which the video was presented evidenced acquiescence, and contained cues that only one familiar with the nuances of Islamic sensibilities would recognize.

"Gabriel noted that in the Islamic world, negotiation is only proposed when a party is prepared to admit defeat, or is stalling in order to regroup. We've seen this countless times in the dealings between Palestinian terrorist organizations and Israel. It is unlikely that White House experts on diplomatic protocol were unaware of these facts; when one considers Obama's unique understanding of the Muslim world, it becomes clear that his comportment and the message of weakness and deference he sent were deliberate.

"While Jimmy Carter's abysmal foreign policy was rooted in an immature view of the world combined with his grandiose self-image, and Bill Clinton's in an aversion to taking risks, it is all but apparent that Obama's is geared toward sabotaging American preeminence."